Digital Twin Integration for Predictive Maintenance and Performance Optimization of Maritime Academy Training

Authors

  • Chanra Purnama Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
  • Marihot Simanjuntak Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
  • Larsen Barasa Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55123/ijisit.v3i1.58

Keywords:

Cyber-Physical Systems, Digital Twin, Fleet Optimization, Maritime Training Vessels, Predictive Maintenance

Abstract

Maritime training vessels represent institutions' largest capital investments averaging $15-45 million per vessel yet operate suboptimally with 58% average utilization rates and 22% unplanned downtime creating capacity constraints limiting student sea-time training hours critical for STCW competency requirements, while maintenance practices following rigid calendar schedules ignore actual usage intensity variations wasting 35-40% of maintenance budgets on premature servicing or allowing equipment degradation through insufficient intervention. This research presents the design and validation of digital twin technology integrating real-time vessel sensor data with physics-based performance models and machine learning predictive analytics enabling condition-based maintenance optimization, voyage planning efficiency, and fleet coordination for training vessel operations at Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta. Employing design science research methodology with qualitative stakeholder evaluation, the study engaged vessel operations managers (n=8), marine engineers (n=10), and maritime educators (n=12) through structured interviews examining digital twin accuracy, decision support utility, and pedagogical integration. The hybrid physics-ML digital twin architecture deployed 150+ IoT sensors across six training vessels capturing propulsion system performance, auxiliary machinery conditions, fuel consumption patterns, and operational parameters with real-time synchronization to cloud-hosted virtual models updated every 2-3 seconds. Thematic analysis revealed strong support for digital twin deployment, identifying critical themes of maintenance cost reduction, vessel availability improvement, and educational enhancement. Pilot implementation across 18-month period demonstrated 34% maintenance cost reduction ($918,000 annual savings), 47% increase in vessel availability (from 58% to 86% utilization), 28% fuel consumption reduction through voyage optimization, and 89% accuracy in predicting equipment failures 5-14 days ahead enabling proactive intervention, contributing validated digital twin architectures and empirical evidence supporting cyber-physical system adoption in maritime education addressing asset management efficiency and student training capacity maximization imperatives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] International Maritime Organization, Guidelines for Maritime Training Vessel Operations. London, UK: IMO Publishing, 2019.

[2] D. Paulauskas, L. Filina-Dawidowicz, and V. Paulauskas, "Maritime asset digitalization trends," Transport Research Procedia, vol. 54, pp. 128-135, 2021.

[3] A. Manuel and T. Baumler, "Digital transformation in maritime education," WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, vol. 19, pp. 495-513, 2020.

[4] STIP Jakarta, Training Vessel Fleet Assessment Report 2024. Jakarta: STIP Jakarta, 2024.

[5] Ministry of Transportation Republic of Indonesia, Maritime Education Development Strategic Plan 2020-2030. Jakarta: Directorate General of Sea Transportation, 2020.

[6] M. B. Simanjuntak, T. Handayani, and S. Soejatminah, "Maritime training infrastructure efficiency," Journal of Maritime Education, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 45-62, 2023.

[7] F. Tao, H. Zhang, A. Liu, and A. Y. C. Nee, "Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 2405-2415, 2019.

[8] E. Glaessgen and D. Stargel, "The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and U.S. Air Force vehicles," in Proc. 53rd AIAA/ASME Structures Conf., Honolulu, HI, 2012, pp. 1-14.

[9] A. R. Hevner, S. T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram, "Design science in information systems research," MIS Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 75-105, 2004.

[10] M. Grieves and J. Vickers, "Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior," in Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems, F. J. Kahlen et al., Eds. Cham: Springer, 2017, pp. 85-113.

[11] F. Tao et al., "Digital twin-driven product design framework," International Journal of Production Research, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 3935-3953, 2019.

[12] D. Gašević, S. Dawson, and G. Siemens, "Let's not forget: Learning analytics are about learning," TechTrends, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 64-71, 2015.

[13] J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2018.

[14] A. Pardo and G. Siemens, "Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics," British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 438-450, 2014.

[15] W. Kritzinger, M. Karner, G. Traar, J. Henjes, and W. Sihn, "Digital twin in manufacturing," Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 48, pp. 1-8, 2018.

[16] Q. Qi et al., "Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin," Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 58, pp. 3-21, 2021.

[17] J. Lee, B. Bagheri, and H. Kao, "A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0," Manufacturing Letters, vol. 3, pp. 18-23, 2015.

[18] M. Fullan, The New Meaning of Educational Change, 5th ed. New York: Teachers College Press, 2016.

[19] C. Dede, "Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning," Science, vol. 323, no. 5910, pp. 66-69, 2009.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-15

How to Cite

Chanra Purnama, Simanjuntak, M., & Barasa, L. (2026). Digital Twin Integration for Predictive Maintenance and Performance Optimization of Maritime Academy Training . IJISIT: International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.55123/ijisit.v3i1.58

Issue

Section

Articles